CHOCNETTE GİFT
İlk kez gerçek çikolatayı siz değerli müşterilerimizle buluşturan Chocnette markasının kurucularından yeni proje… Pastanecilerin, tekstil markalarının yer aldığı hediyelik çikolata pazarına yüksek kalitede yepyeni soluk: Choc’nette Gift siz değerli müşterilerimizin beğenisine sunulur. Çikolata binlerce yıldır insanların vazgeçilmez ortak lezzeti oldu. Mutluluk kaynağı çikolata günümüzde insanların en tatlı hediyesi oldu. Gösterişli ve yüksek kalitede çikolatalara ulaşmak şimdi daha kolay. Tasarımcılar tarafından özenle hazırlanmış gösterişli ambalajlarında gerçek çikolatalar…
Sevdiklerinize onur ve gurur mu yaşatmak istiyorsunuz?
Kaliteli ve gösterişli bir hediye mi arıyorsunuz?
Artık yüksek kalitede çikolatayı en gösterişli kutularda bulabileceksiniz. 2009 yılından bu yana siz değerli müşterilerimize Göztepe Optimum Alışveriş Merkezinde hizmet vermekteyiz.
Choc’nette Gift ‘e hoşgeldiniz!
Facebook Hesabımız : TIKLA GİR

Time Newspaper

Chocobazaar Yenilendi !

 Dünyanın En Önemli Çikolata Satış Sitelerinden Chocobazaar Artık Türkiye'de Sizlerle !
Söz ve Nişan Çikolatalarından , Konuşan Çikolatalara, Bebek Çikolatalarına, Kısaca Çikolata Adına Herşey Chocobazaar' da !

 İndirimli Ürünler, Hediyeli Ürünler , Sayısız Süprizler
Chocobazaar'da !

Sizlerde Dünyanın Çikolata Merkezini Ziyaret Edin Fırsatları Kaçırmayın !

www.chocobazaar.com

Lifelogging: What it means for anonymity

Your smartphone knows where you live, Facebook knows what you like, and there’s a host of pictures and statuses you’re happy to post online. Yet, having your photo being taken anytime by anyone in public feels strange. Why is that?

The always-on society is the future feared by those who prefer to keep our private lives... well, private.

Everyone likes to think they choose what is shared online but, if the niche trend of lifelogging catches on, there will be a lot more of us to see than anyone expected. The notion that you can record what you see and experience throws up an interesting consequence: if you are not in the viewpoint, other people are.

Click’s LJ Rich explains the growing phenomenon and the implications it has for us all.

If you would like to comment on this video or anything else you have seen on Future, head over to our Facebook page or message us on Twitter.

You can also find the Click team on Facebook or at @BBCClick.
BBC

Nokia wins ban in the Netherlands on HTC One component

Nokia has won a court injunction banning HTC from using microphone components in its flagship HTC One smartphones.

It will create more headaches for the Taiwan-based firm, which has struggled with component shortages.

Nokia said it had taken apart the HTC One and found the high-amplitude audio-capture technology was the same as its own.

HTC said it would be looking for alternatives "immediately".

The ruling made by the Amsterdam District Court is effective until March 2014 and will prevent STMicro, which sells the parts, from offering them to HTC for sale.

The court found the parts had been invented by Nokia and manufactured exclusively for the Finnish company's phones.

Nokia said: "HTC has no licence or authorisation from Nokia to use these microphones or the Nokia technologies from which they have been developed.

"The injunction prevents STMicroelectronics from selling the microphones to anyone except us, anywhere in the world, until 1 March 2014. Its scope is not restricted to the Netherlands.

"The HAAC [high amplitude audio capture] technology used in these microphones is Nokia's and there is no alternate supplier."

In a statement, HTC said it was disappointed by the decision.

"We are considering whether it will have any impact on our business and we will explore alternative solutions immediately," it said.

A spokesman for STMicro - which has its headquarters in Geneva - said his company planned to challenge the ruling.

"A decision has been rendered by the Amsterdam Court, prohibiting ST to sell a specific microphone on the open market," he said.

"ST intends to appeal this decision. In the meantime, ST is ready to propose alternative solutions."
BBC

Compelling cars of the 2013 Shanghai motor show

Shanghai calling
Alternating each year with the Beijing motor show, Auto Shanghai has evolved into the Frankfurt motor show of Asia.

Like that event in Germany’s financial capital, the Shanghai salon, which runs throughout the week, tempers its smattering of flamboyant concepts with a heaping of production-bound machinery. The majority of vehicles on display will directly impact the profits and perception of their makers.

Chinese manufacturers have hired away executives from European and American automakers in recent years to acquire some of the quality control know-how and distinctive styling of world-class brands. And with each iteration, the Shanghai show demonstrates that the domestic market has wizened.

Western automakers, meanwhile, are ecstatic to sell their products in the world’s largest auto market, even as they gird themselves for Chinese companies’ inevitable push into the markets they have long dominated. Taking a look at the highlights from Shanghai– as we do here – that reckoning appears closer than ever.
BBC

Day Centers Sprout Up, Luring Fit Elders and Costing Medicaid

Nearby, older people speaking Chinese filled a supermarket-size storefront with vigorous games of table tennis, billiards and mah-jongg, and ordered free lunch from a takeout menu featuring minced pork, beef and salty fish.

In Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, at the new R & G Social Adult Day Care Center, known locally among elderly immigrants for luring clients with cash and grocery vouchers, most people there for lunch did not stay to eat. Instead, many walked briskly toward the subway carrying bags stuffed with takeout containers, and two elderly men rode away on bicycles with the free food.

Not a wheelchair or walker was in sight at these so-called social adult day care centers. Yet the cost of attendance was indirectly being paid by Medicaid, under Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo’s sweeping redesign of $2 billion in spending on long-term care meant for the impaired elderly and those with disabilities.

Such centers have mushroomed, from storefronts and basements to a new development in the Bronx that recently figured in a corruption scandal. With little regulation and less oversight, they grew in two years from eight tiny programs for people with dementia to at least 192 businesses across the city.

Managed care companies, financed by Medicaid, pay the centers to provide services to members. But the door swings both ways: Centers also refer new clients to the companies.

Managed care became mandatory last year for people receiving home services who are eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare. The idea is to try to control spending, but about a third of the 92,000 people so far enrolled in the system statewide are newcomers to such services, many responding to aggressive marketing by social day care centers.

Centers collected over $25 million from managed care plans in the first nine months of 2012, at roughly $93 per person per session, according to state figures. The managed care companies are paid by Medicaid; in New York City, the rate is about $3,800 a month per member.

“The whole thing is going to end up costing the state much more money,” said Valerie Bogart, a lawyer with New York Legal Assistance Group who specializes in advocacy for frail elderly and disabled people. “It’s really up to the managed care plans to be the watchdogs now, and it’s like the fox watching the chicken coop, because they have an incentive to make money from these centers, too.”

It was not supposed to play out this way. The bold Medicaid overhaul, part of a grand bargain with the state’s most politically powerful health care players, has been promoted as a national model for curbing costs and reversing the incentives for fraud. It transferred tens of thousands of recipients of long-term care from a system in which providers billed Medicaid for each service to managed care, in which a capped monthly rate must cover all services to a company’s enrollees.

With the largest Medicaid budget in the country, $54 billion, New York is trying not only to rein in runaway spending, but also to “rebalance” it, away from costly institutional care, like nursing homes and medical models known for overbilling, to inexpensive supports that keep people safely in their communities.

In that context, Jason Helgerson, the state’s Medicaid chief, defended the rapid expansion of social-model adult day care, saying that without a chance to socialize and connect with others, Medicaid clients would suffer a decline in health that would add costs. But when a reporter described some of the practices observed at centers, he expressed surprise and anger.

“The idea that people are bicycling home from managed long-term care is a complete misnomer,” Mr. Helgerson said. “The idea that they’re playing Ping-Pong — I guess they could be wheelchair-bound Ping-Pong players, but otherwise it’s fraud and they are not eligible.”

Beneficiaries are supposed to be impaired enough to need at least 120 days of help with tasks like walking, bathing or taking medication. But managed care companies, not government agencies, are now mainly in charge of determining eligibility, typically by using nurses to assess each potential member.

“It is being gamed,” said an executive at a managed care company, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “There are just plums in the payment system. And the state will choose to be blind about this until something happens, which is what they did with nursing homes.”